Online Now 117

The Friday Fizz 5/29

Before you post a response to the column wondering why the Friday Fizz is published on a Tuesday, remember “The Fizz” is a personality, not a story title. Without further ado, let’s get straight to Arizona softball.

Arizona Wildcats

Believe it or not, Angelo Chol (No. 30) is looking even more muscular these days.

I’m concerned. Is UA softball going the way of Wildcat basketball? Stick with me here. Under Lute Olson, Arizona reached the Final Four at least once every four years (after reaching its first Final Four in 1988). However, that streak was snapped when Illinois broke the will of every Wildcat fan with its stunning closing minutes rally in the 2005 Elite Eight. Hence, the last time Arizona basketball made a Final Four was 2001. Think about that for a second, 2001! Yes, folks, that’s over a decade ago. Similarly, Arizona softball just missed the WCWS for the second-straight season for the first time in over two decades. Granted, this isn’t anything to get overly worried about, but Arizona softball is no longer the guaranteed super power of the west in women’s athletics. The question is why? Parity plays a big part, and Arizona should be credited for creating such parity. After dominating softball for nearly 15 years, the Wildcats forced other Pac-10 programs to up the ante and invest in their softball programs. However, it’s more than that because despite the improved play of conference teams (Cal, ASU and Oregon all reached this year’s WCWS), Arizona isn’t getting blasted by these programs in the NCAA’s. Oklahoma has pasted the Wildcats in the past two Super Regionals, including last weekend when the Sooners outscored the Wildcats 13-1 over two games to sweep the series and advance. The year prior, Arizona was eliminated from the World Series after getting decimated by Alabama. Personally, it seems like Arizona pitching has taken a hit (no pun intended) in recent seasons. Is it the hurlers, is it the loss of Nancy Evans as pitching coach? I’m not sure what the answer is, but since Taryn Mowatt graduated, the Wildcats haven’t had a dominant, unhittable presence taking the mound night in and night out.

While my support of the NBA has waned over time, one thing I do love about the league is winning championships come with a heavy price. The Miami Heat proved yet again that you can’t “buy” a ring without at least first having your wings clipped. Instead, teams need to first lose before they can win, almost like having to lose big before you can win big in Las Vegas. It took an epic Larry Bird steal and Dennis Johnson layup that crushed the Pistons before Detroit finally earned their championships. It took seven years for Dallas to finally get over the hump. Same for the San Antonio Spurs. Worse, some teams like the Phoenix Suns never got over the hump. This year, my guess is Miami breaks through, but not if they have to face the Spurs in the NBA Finals because team’s need to first take their lumps. Some would argue that the Heat falling to the Mavericks a year ago was a big enough lump, but the NBA basketball gods know better and may have more pain in store for LeBron James and others before they finally break through and get their hands on that awful looking trophy.

Speaking of the Heat, it was a comedy of errors for the Celtics in a game one loss to Miami Monday. The Celtics were 11-for-21 from the foul line (sound familiar Arizona basketball fans), shot 39% from the floor, had three technical fouls whistled against two players and their coach (for saying “C’mon Eddie” to the official), and a fourth on the team when Kevin Garnett was whistled for a delay of game violation. While it’s difficult imagining an aging Boston club beating the younger Heat, if I were a Miami fan I wouldn’t exactly feel comfortable either. Paul Pierce and Ray Allen (6-for-25 FGs) were non-factors on the offensive end of the floor, and Boston’s bench as a whole got torched by their Miami counterparts. If Boston can get anything resembling five players playing in unison on Wednesday, they could easily steal the game and strike some fear in the Heat. However, it will take better efforts from anyone not named Kevin Garnett and Rajon Rando as they appear they only two Celtics who have their heads screwed on straight right now.

Basketball writer Mike DeCourcey has Arizona basketball ranked No. 10 in his early preseason rankings. He won’t be the last to have the 2012-13 Wildcats in a preseason top 10 list. The addition of Xavier graduate and transfer Mark Lyons to Arizona gives the Wildcats a second senior out to prove something in his final college basketball season. Lyons, along with Arizona forward Solomon Hill will provide the Wildcats with two things the team sorely lacked last season, leadership and consistency. In any sport, the main thing a coach seeks from his roster is the ability to “count” on production from certain players. Whether a guy averages 20 points a game, or five, hitting that average consistently gives a team much-needed assurance when they take the floor. A year ago, aside from Jessie Perry’s double-doubles and Hill’s 12-15 points per night, Sean Miller couldn’t rely on any other player contributing to their averages each game. That’s just brutal, and a big reason why Arizona would look great on a Thursday and average on a Saturday. This season, things will be better because Miller can count on Hill and Lyons scoring in double figures every night. He can also count on about 10 points from shooting guard Nick Johnson, as well as about 6-8 rebounds and 2-3 blocks from Angelo Chol, who continues to add pure muscle to his already athletic frame. If the Wildcats can average 20-plus points from its starting backcourt next season (Lyons and Johnson), then the floor will open up inside for Arizona’s overhauled frontline to get the one-one-one matchups younger players need to be effective. Further, if someone like senior Kevin Parrom returns to being the Charlie Hustle guy fans are accustomed to seeing, the pressure on the Wildcat underclassmen to step in and contribute will be eased off enough to put them into a position to shine without the same level of scrutiny Johnson, Chol and Josiah Turner faced in 2011-12.

On the football side of the house, it’s going to drive me crazy to see Arizona predicted to finish around eighth-place in the conference – again. While Arizona has the home schedule (8 home games) to give itself a fighting chance, the Wildcats won’t be the only team in the Pac-12 who improved its program this offseason. USC, barring a meteor shower in Los Angeles this summer, will be the preaseason No. 1 team in the country – and the Trojans are in Arizona’s division. The Oregon Ducks are a top 10 team for sure while schools like Stanford, Washington, Utah and UCLA could all easily live inside the Top 25 for long stretches next season. The point is Arizona can’t rely on home field advantage as a means to winning games in 2012. Instead, the Wildcats will need to play well, and much better than they did in 2011. While I can’t see Arizona performing any worse than they did a season ago, I can see Arizona playing at a high level and still losing games. The reason is the wholesale changes being made to all three units. The philosophy is different, the alignments are different, the plays are different, and even the terminology is different. Working in Arizona’s favor is I’m a big believer in “attitude” at the college level, and if the attitude is right and guys are on the same page, mentally, good things can happen overnight. The bad news is insiders continue to share tales of separation within the program between those who have bought into Rich Rodriguez’s concepts and those who still need some convincing. The hope is those differences get ironed out this summer, along with the timing of Arizona’s offense when the skill players will work 7-on-7 drills until they’re blue in the face.

By now everyone’s seen the proposed copper helmet Arizona football plans to wear from time to time in future seasons. I used to be a traditionalist when it came to college sports, but those days have passed me by. So, I’ll make a deal with the University right now. I promise not to bash the copper helmets and whatever “special” uniform designers create to match as long as the team where’s copper-colored shoes to make the outfit complete from head to toe.

This is what cracks me up about life. The Department of Justice has been investigating the University of Montana, and the city of Missoula, for improper handling of sexual assault incidents on the campus. These incidents reportedly involved the Montana football team. After the long investigation, this brilliant response is the Montana school system Board of Regents came up with:

“The board directed each state college to appoint a coordinator to oversee gender equality issues. All employees will be required to undergo training for proper reporting of sexual assaults, and university staff most likely to field such complaints will receive advanced instruction. There are policies aimed at protecting the confidentiality of alleged victims. And the guidelines call for prompt investigation and written conclusion for each case with notification to parties involved.”

Is this stuff not common sense? Does each state college really have to appoint a coordinator to “oversee gender equality issues?” My point is how has this not already been done years, if not decades ago? It would seem to be that the Student Affairs office, or even each school’s human resources department would already be overseeing these types of programs, and more importantly have steps in place for all university officials (i.e. teachers, coaches, administrators, etc.) to follow when witness to, or informed of a sexual assault. Hey, I’m glad they’re taking action because sexual harassment and assault are no joking matter, but the schools having to be told that this stuff is not only important, but really, really, really serious is baffling to me.

With that said, here are my five common sense tips to help you survive the week:

1. Keep your head on a swivel and know your surroundings. If you can’t peel your eyes away from Facebook on your mobile phone for five minutes, you shouldn’t be allowed to walk in public.
2. Use your turn signal when driving. It’s amazing what this little flashing light can communicate to other drivers on the road.
3. Don’t be that guy or gal who orders seven lattes at Starbucks for the office staff. Not only do you make a three person wait a 10 person wait at the snap of a finger, you’re obviously at the bottom rung of your corporate ladder. It’s time to take a step up, bud.
4. For once, think before you speak. You just might realize that sometimes silence sends the loudest message.

Finally, a Laurel and Hardy congratulations to Arizona men’s baseball for not only becoming co-conference champions and making the NCAA’s, but for earning a host seed for the regionals, which begin this week. The Wildcats will take on Missouri Friday night, and could face Louisville, New Mexico State, or both, as the regional pod plays out in round-robin format. All Tucson regional games, except those on Sunday, will be televised on ESPNU, beginning with Arizona’s matchup with Mizzou on Friday at 8 p.m. PDT. Sunday’s game(s) will be aired at ESPN3.com.

Have a great week!

Bear Down, Everyone! And Bear Down, Arizona!

Gary Randazzo is publisher of Wildcat Sports Report. You can follow him on Twitter @garyrandazzo.

    • Good Fizz Gary, Drinking a beer and reading it on a train from Qingdao to Beijing. For some reason, I did not think about it not being Friday even though it is Tuesday evening here? Go figure!

      This post was edited by PEB13 on 5/29/2012 at 3:49 AM

      PEB13

    • Sure, use your turn signal.... But turn the damn thing off when done.... :))

      Mrzipityduda

    • Ucla...top25....hahahahaha

      Wildcat_Brad

    • With that said, here are my five common sense tips to help you survive the week:

      1. Keep your head on a swivel and know your surroundings. If you can’t peel your eyes away from Facebook on your mobile phone for five minutes, you shouldn’t be allowed to walk in public.

      Some of the most dangerous intersections I know are on Speedway, north of campus. I could also rant on the skateboarders that come in at the speeds of a bicycle...while using the wrong side of the lane. Also see comment number 2.

      2. Use your turn signal when driving. It’s amazing what this little flashing light can communicate to other drivers on the road.

      It is amazing that defensive-driving involves playing the guessing game to the extent it has. The good ones see the slight float of the vehicle moving toward the intended direction and brake or speed-up appropriately. I can't help but be biased toward California license plates when seeing and judging this behavior. If I were a psychologist, I would say that non-use of the turn-signal is an accepted form of California driving due to external environmental pressures, ie: freeways.

      3. Don’t be that guy or gal who orders seven lattes at Starbucks for the office staff. Not only do you make a three person wait a 10 person wait at the snap of a finger, you’re obviously at the bottom rung of your corporate ladder. It’s time to take a step up, bud.

      Starbucks lines are universal no matter where you go. It's a license to give payback because that same person had to watch people in front of them do the exact same thing. A think this is the "competitive business model" from Starbucks that allows them to thrive.

      4. For once, think before you speak. You just might realize that sometimes silence sends the loudest message.

      Except for those that make silence a secret of their success and career longevity while really offering nothing to the conversation at all. This is a fine balancing act that requires one to be informed on the topic while accepting criticism and input when less informed. I still respect those that speak up with little information over those that just nod their head, providing it moves the conversation forward.

      Gary, what was the fifth piece of advice?

      This post has been edited 4 times, most recently by Ashton on 5/29/2012 at 1:40 PM

      Ashton

    • The 5th common sense tip is take advice from The Fizz at your own risk.

      Gary Randazzo

    • Great article!

      Under the "what Miller could rely on last year" - why did you leave out Fogg?

      He started all 36 games, just like Solo and he averaged 18 seconds per game less and he was hobbled in February.

      He led the team in points for the season and and PPG (13.5)
      He was third in rebounding - (the shortest guy on the team who plays a long way from the hoop).
      He led the team in steals
      He had the best assist to T/O ratio of the starters
      He was the top FT shooter on the team
      He was the top 3 point shooter of the starters and only BLav was better on the team.

      Not taking anything away from anyone else but I think you could make the argument that Fogg was the most essential component last year or was at least as essential as any other player. Hill may have been more critical because of size, but I think Miller relied on Fogg just as much as anyone else.

      wineknow

    • the 2005 great 8 game against Illinois still pisses me off. I'm better now, but it took a good 4-5 years after that game to be able to watch a BBall game in which I cared about the outcome.

      626orbust

    • Gary Randazzo said...

      The 5th common sense tip is take advice from The Fizz at your own risk.

      I thought that was the 13th Commandment

      bpwildcat

    • wineknow said...

      Great article!

      Under the "what Miller could rely on last year" - why did you leave out Fogg?

      He started all 36 games, just like Solo and he averaged 18 seconds per game less and he was hobbled in February.

      He led the team in points for the season and and PPG (13.5) He was third in rebounding - (the shortest guy on the team who plays a long way from the hoop). He led the team in steals He had the best assist to T/O ratio of the starters He was the top FT shooter on the team He was the top 3 point shooter of the starters and only BLav was better on the team.

      Not taking anything away from anyone else but I think you could make the argument that Fogg was the most essential component last year or was at least as essential as any other player. Hill may have been more critical because of size, but I think Miller relied on Fogg just as much as anyone else.

      That's a fair point wineknow.

      For me, I felt Fogg needed his teammates, though, to get his scoring (i.e. Miller had to work Fogg off of screens and stuff) whereas Hill and Perry got it done as individuals (driving and o-boards).

      I concede the case for Fogg, though. He did produce consistently, and deserves some credit.

      That said I think we'll see a big difference from Lyons. For all intensive purposes, Lyons and Fogg are basically 2-guards (although Lyons will play PG this year). We'll see Lyons better able to create his own shots compared to Fogg, and that will free up the offense to work more screening action away from the ball rather than on the ball and get back to a true 4-around-1 motion offense that Miller prefers (spreading the floor and using dribble penetration to create).

      This post was edited by Gary Randazzo on 5/30/2012 at 2:05 AM

      Gary Randazzo

    • 626orbust said...

      the 2005 great 8 game against Illinois still pisses me off. I'm better now, but it took a good 4-5 years after that game to be able to watch a BBall game in which I cared about the outcome.

      Ditto! I have a buddy who is a big Illinois fan and he knows how much that game makes me angry ( I almost lost my job because of the tantrum I threw at work an hour after the game when an Ilinois fan started taunting me right when I walked in). Anyhow when I was having a gathering he thought it would be funny to put a dvd in of the game and play it, and see how long it would take for me to notice. Well I acted like I didn't notice at all, then when he finally left the room I cracked it in half and put it on my coffee table...

      ...that was six months ago, okay I admit ( and Brad will tell you this) I am about the worst loser out there, but the wounds create scars that run deep!

      Canyon

    • Losing is for losers!!rockon That is why coaching for me is so difficult...I hate to lose! I hate it even more when I can't make the call I want to secure the victory and the head coach calls something different. That is the worst!!

      tonytone04

    • Fogg is a great example of a player who worked hard to utilize his skill sets.

      Good defender with long, long arms.

      Fogg definitely played to his potential and maybe a bit beyond what he was projected to do when he was recruited.

      Since Lyons can create his own shot, he will bring a dimension that Fogg didn't have, and having him on the point will lend stability and experience, and especially leadership to the team. Time will tell if the pieces fit together.

      BlkMtn

    • You book your tickets to Tucson for any of the great eight home games yet, Gary?

      EricWKayUA

    • EricWKayUA said...

      You book your tickets to Tucson for any of the great eight home games yet, Gary?

      Not yet, Eric. Working on it. OK ST seems like a guarantee at this point, though.

      One of my favorite movie lines regarding winning and losing:

      Actor 1: "I'll try my best."

      Actor 2: "Try your best? Losers try their best. Winners go home and screw the prom queen."

      Bottom line, winning is everything!

      Gary Randazzo

    • "Carla WAS the prom queen."

      EricWKayUA

    • Canyon said...

      Ditto! I have a buddy who is a big Illinois fan and he knows how much that game makes me angry ( I almost lost my job because of the tantrum I threw at work an hour after the game when an Ilinois fan started taunting me right when I walked in). Anyhow when I was having a gathering he thought it would be funny to put a dvd in of the game and play it, and see how long it would take for me to notice. Well I acted like I didn't notice at all, then when he finally left the room I cracked it in half and put it on my coffee table...

      ...that was six months ago, okay I admit ( and Brad will tell you this) I am about the worst loser out there, but the wounds create scars that run deep!

      censored you guys for even bringing it up!!! Everyone here thinks I hate Shakur but it was after that game that it was obvious he was not nearly as good as everyone thought. He had like 8 TO's in the last few minutes of that game - it was ridiculous. Best PG in the country, my ass. And I am still not over it. Don't think I ever will be. The intentionally corrupt officiating in the 2001 championship game and the Asswipe students chanting "Bobbi" at Lute weeks after her passing are the only thing that get me more upset. Him pointing at the scoreboard mitigates some of that.

      I can barely concede that Illinois was a decent team that year - no way I could watch that game again and would likely destroy someones dvr or dvd player if they made me try to watch it.

      censored censored censored censored!!!!

      wineknow

Already have an account? Sign In

Add a comment
Want to be involved in the discussion? Start Free Trial